From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Shivesh Wangrungvichaisri <sbw(at)appsig(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #4996: postgres.exe memory consumption keeps going up |
Date: | 2009-08-23 02:37:49 |
Message-ID: | 4A90AB7D.4030602@postnewspapers.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On 19/08/2009 11:50 PM, Shivesh Wangrungvichaisri wrote:
> Logged by: Shivesh Wangrungvichaisri
> Email address: sbw(at)appsig(dot)com
> PostgreSQL version: 8.3.7
> Operating system: Windows XP x64 / Windows 7 x64
> Description: postgres.exe memory consumption keeps going up
> - Example code that should demonstrate the problem:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1280513/posgressql-memory-leaque (note we
> use Intel TBB to launch threads..you can use whatever thread library you
> want.)
I went to build your example for testing, but found that the threading
library you use isn't freely available. Any chance you can post a
version using the standard win32 threading calls and test that version
to make sure it still exhibits the problem?
(I do a little bit of programming on Windows, but all of it is
cross-platform code that sticks to POSIX APIs or uses the Qt library, so
I never have to touch the actual win32 bits and know very little about
things like win32's threading. As such, if I try converting it myself I
won't be confident I'm really accurately testing the same thing you are).
--
Craig Ringer
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2009-08-23 02:40:25 | Re: BUG #4996: postgres.exe memory consumption keeps going up |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2009-08-23 01:44:13 | Re: 8.4.0 data loss / HOT-related bug |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2009-08-23 02:40:25 | Re: BUG #4996: postgres.exe memory consumption keeps going up |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-08-23 01:17:46 | 8.5 release timetable, again |