Re: improving my query plan

From: Chris <dmagick(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kevin Kempter <kevink(at)consistentstate(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: improving my query plan
Date: 2009-08-21 01:21:45
Message-ID: 4A8DF6A9.9040705@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Kevin Kempter wrote:
> Hi all;
>
>
> I have a simple query against two very large tables ( > 800million rows
> in theurl_hits_category_jt table and 9.2 million in the url_hits_klk1
> table )
>
>
> I have indexes on the join columns and I've run an explain.
> also I've set the default statistics to 250 for both join columns. I get
> a very high overall query cost:

If you had an extra where condition it might be different, but you're
just returning results from both tables that match up so doing a
sequential scan is going to be the fastest way anyway.

--
Postgresql & php tutorials
http://www.designmagick.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2009-08-21 01:32:02 Re: number of rows estimation for bit-AND operation
Previous Message Greg Stark 2009-08-21 00:53:54 Re: Number of tables