Temp table or normal table for performance?

From: Stephen Cook <sclists(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Temp table or normal table for performance?
Date: 2009-08-19 07:03:28
Message-ID: 4A8BA3C0.1020108@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Let's say I have a function that needs to collect some data from various
tables and process and sort them to be returned to the user.

In general, would it be better to create a temporary table in that
function, do the work and sorting there, and return it... or keep a
permanent table for pretty much the same thing, but add a "user session"
field and return the relevant rows from that and then delete them?

Sorry this is vague, I know it most likely depends on the workload and
such, but I'm just putting this together now. I could go either way, and
also switch it up in the future if necessary. Is there a rule of thumb
on this one? I'm a bit biased against temporary tables, but then again
if the normal table gets a lot of action it might not be the optimal choice.

Thanks and regards,

Stephen Cook

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2009-08-19 07:06:14 Re: Idle processes chewing up CPU?
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2009-08-19 07:03:13 Re: pl/pgsql loop thru columns names