| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Nikhil Sontakke <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema |
| Date: | 2009-08-15 20:49:10 |
| Message-ID: | 4A871F46.1040002@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I'm also not sure I want to be trying to execute any arbitrary string
> that accidentally gets placed there because someone forgot to put a
> keyword or accidentally deleted it.
>
> But I'm not too dogmatic on the subject. What do others think?
Given that $$ is also used to quote non-procedural strings, I don't like
the idea that psql would be trying to execute any string I gave it after
forgetting "select". If nothing else, that would lead to confusing and
misleading error messages.
Ideally, we'd be able to execute *any* PL that way by setting a shell
variable:
\pl plperl
DO $f$ foreach ( @_ ) { ...
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hitoshi Harada | 2009-08-15 20:49:25 | Re: Why we have tuplestore and tuplesort? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-08-15 20:23:20 | pgsql: Remove tabs from SGML. |