Re: Proxy for postgres

From: John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>
To: martins(dot)listz(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proxy for postgres
Date: 2009-08-14 18:36:03
Message-ID: 4A85AE93.3040905@hogranch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Martin Spinassi wrote:
> So, what you suggest is:
>
> |---------> Master <---|
> pg_pool2 ---| |----- Slony
> |---------> Slave <---|
>
>
> Can't figure out if this is gonna work, configuring pg_pool2 to read
> both, making slony replicate, and app directly to Master (or pg_pool2
> can be configured to write just in one of both?).
>

something like that.

see the pgpool-II tutorial at
http://pgpool.projects.postgresql.org/pgpool-II/doc/tutorial-en.html

note it also can do replication, but it does it at the front end rather
than the back end like slony. each has its advantages and disadvantages.
(I've also heard, repeatedly, that pgpool-II's replication isn't that great)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sam Mason 2009-08-14 19:21:17 Re: pgstatindex
Previous Message Neil Best 2009-08-14 18:31:44 Re: [HACKERS] \copy: unexpected response (4)