From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: pgindent timing (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor NUM_cache_remove calls in error report path to a PG_TRY) |
Date: | 2009-08-12 01:42:50 |
Message-ID: | 4A821E1A.5050408@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Greg Stark<gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
>
>> Of course
>> in all likelihood tom would have rewritten their first patch
>> anyways...
>>
>
> Maybe I'm taking life too seriously at the moment, but I find this
> comment kind of snide and unhelpful.
>
Yes, you're taking life too seriously ;-) I took it that there was an
implied smiley at the end of this remark. It certainly didn't strike me
that it was snide.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-08-12 01:54:21 | Re: pgindent timing (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor NUM_cache_remove calls in error report path to a PG_TRY) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-08-12 01:42:37 | Re: Re: pgindent timing (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor NUM_cache_remove calls in error report path to a PG_TRY) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2009-08-12 01:44:02 | Re: "Hot standby"? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-08-12 01:42:37 | Re: Re: pgindent timing (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Refactor NUM_cache_remove calls in error report path to a PG_TRY) |