Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m?
Date: 2009-08-11 22:06:54
Message-ID: 4A81EB7E.4050003@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance


> I don't think that's the name of the parameter, since a Google search
> gives zero hits. There are so many fiddly parameters for this thing
> that I don't want to speculate about which one you meant.

Sorry, subject line had it correct.

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/runtime-config-client.html#GUC-VACUUM-FREEZE-MIN-AGE

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-08-11 22:19:21 TODO item: Allow more complex user/database default GUC settings
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2009-08-11 22:04:05 Re: "Hot standby"?

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-08-12 00:54:44 Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2009-08-11 21:45:55 Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m?