| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema |
| Date: | 2009-08-05 20:34:39 |
| Message-ID: | 4A79ECDF.4020700@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Josh's position that "this should be standard SQL" is nonsense, or
> at least he ought to be making that argument to the standards committee
> not us.
Huh? When did I say that?
> If we want something built-in, maybe providing some prefab plpgsql
> functions is the way to go. But we'd have to arrive at a consensus
> on what best practice of that form looks like.
*Built-in* functions are just as good as extra syntax, as far as I'm
concerned.
Functions which require installing plpgsql, reading the docs, creating a
function, pasting it in, and saving it are NOT as good; they are
unlikely to ever be used, except by the people who didn't really need
them in the first place.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-08-05 20:39:09 | Re: slow commits with heavy temp table usage in 8.4.0 |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-08-05 20:30:18 | Re: Alpha Releases: Docs? |