| From: | Andreas Wenk <a(dot)wenk(at)netzmeister-st-pauli(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>, Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>, pgsql-general List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Video available for PGDay SJC '09 |
| Date: | 2009-07-28 14:17:40 |
| Message-ID: | 4A6F0884.3050805@netzmeister-st-pauli.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Greg Stark schrieb:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Andreas
> Wenk<a(dot)wenk(at)netzmeister-st-pauli(dot)de> wrote:
> Why not use a standardized openly documented container format like
> mpeg4 with mpeg4 part 2 compression instead of one controlled by a
> single company like flv or quicktime? That would let people play it
> using any of various open source codecs which can play mpeg4 part 2.
another good approach. I understand the point of view. But this menas to download the
files anyway because playing mpeg files in the browser is the same as with mov files - I
think.
All in all my suggestion to convert the videos to flv and let people see the videos in a
flash player was based on the assumption, that
- the files are really smaller so less traffic
- flash video is the most supported format for watching *in the browser*
- it's easy to convert the existing videos to flv
- no need to download the videos
But now I see that there are different opinions if this approach is a good idea. Im a
still confident, that it's not evil to use the format which is best known for the
mainstream ... and maybe this point is what I have to see in a different light. Maybe the
group of people watching the videos are not mainstream ;-)
Cheers
Andy
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christophe Pettus | 2009-07-28 14:38:22 | Re: Video available for PGDay SJC '09 |
| Previous Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2009-07-28 14:08:55 | Re: Relational Algebra and Aggregate Functions |