From: | Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to> |
Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: plpgsql.warn_shadow |
Date: | 2014-01-15 13:00:48 |
Message-ID: | 4A6E8741-F62E-4636-8366-291D8BE50CBC@phlo.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jan15, 2014, at 13:32 , Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to> wrote:
> On 1/15/14 1:23 PM, Florian Pflug wrote:
>> The fact that it's named plpgsql.warnings already clearly documents that this only affects plpgsql. But whether a particular warning is emitted during compilation or during execution it largely irrelevant, I think. For example, if we called this compiler_warning, we'd couldn't add a warning which triggers when SELECT .. INTO ingores excessive rows.
>
> There is the fact that something being a "compiler warning" gives you an idea on its effects on performance. But maybe that would be better described in the documentation (perhaps even more accurately).
>
> I like the idea of warning about SELECT .. INTO, though, but that one could have a non-negligible performance penalty during execution.
I'm not overly concerned about that. I image people would usually enable warnings during development, not production.
best regards,
Florian Pflug
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2014-01-15 13:00:49 | Re: identify table oid for an AggState during plan tree initialization |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2014-01-15 12:54:43 | Re: WAL Rate Limiting |