| From: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects |
| Date: | 2009-07-17 00:13:36 |
| Message-ID: | 4A5FC230.8060501@ak.jp.nec.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> 2009/7/16 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>:
>> However, I don't think the initial proposal of the largeobject
>> security is now on the state to be reviewed seriously.
>
> OK, I am moving this patch to returned with feedback.
If possible, I would like to have a discussion to make consensus
about its design and interfaces before submitting my patch to
the next commit fest.
I'll submit its design proposal (including a few issues) again.
Is there anyone interested in?
Thanks,
--
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-07-17 00:19:51 | Re: Docbook toolchain interfering with patch review? |
| Previous Message | Brendan Jurd | 2009-07-17 00:07:31 | Re: Docbook toolchain interfering with patch review? |