Re: EDB taking over?

From: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: EDB taking over?
Date: 2009-07-08 16:11:01
Message-ID: 4A54C515.7060108@pse-consulting.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Andreas Pflug wrote:
>
>
>> But there's also the aspect that the postgres download page for Windows,
>> Linux and MacOSX will redirect to an EDB page, which really was the
>> first thing that irritated me (forgot to mention). Why is that so, why
>> not a postgres page? Do we want/need EDB to officially host postgres
>> stuff, esp with PostgreSQL listed as one of EDB's featured products?
>>
>
> Right. We have a working mirror system. Why aren't the one-click
> packages hosted there?
>

From an EDB point of view, the answer is simple: it generates a lot of
traffic on a page advertising their products. Imagine you'd have to buy
this traffic with adwords...

Regards,
Andreas

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2009-07-08 16:24:16 Re: EDB taking over?
Previous Message Guido Barosio 2009-07-08 15:50:24 Re: Release is out ... please collect press links!