Re: Re: Synch Rep: direct transfer of WAL file from the primary to the standby

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Dimitri Fontaine" <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Greg Stark" <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Synch Rep: direct transfer of WAL file from the primary to the standby
Date: 2009-07-08 13:59:39
Message-ID: 4A545FFB020000250002855B@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> wrote:

> 4. sync: slave is no more lagging, it's applying the stream as it
> gets it, either as part of the master transaction or not
> depending on the GUC settings

I think the interesting bit is when you're at this point and the
connection between the master and slave goes down for a couple days.
How do you handle that?

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-07-08 14:18:15 Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2009-07-08 13:47:49 Re: pgxs and make check message