Re: Six PostgreSQL questions from a pokerplayer

From: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Patvs <patvs(at)chello(dot)nl>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Six PostgreSQL questions from a pokerplayer
Date: 2009-07-06 06:13:12
Message-ID: 4A5195F8.9030408@paradise.net.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Craig Ringer wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 11:51 -0700, Patvs wrote:
>
>
>
>> With 4 regular harddisks in RAID0 you get great read/write speeds, but the
>> SSDs excel in IO/s and a 0.1ms access time.
>>
>
> ... but are often really, really, really, really slow at writing. The
> fancier ones are fast at writing but generally slow down over time.
>
>

Also, (probably pointing out the obvious here) to be on the safe side
you should avoid RAID0 for any data that is important to you - as it's
pretty easy to get one bad disk straight from new!

With respect to SSD's one option for a small sized database is 2xSSD in
RAID1 - provided they are the *right* SSD that is, which at this point
in time seems to be the Intel X25E. Note that I have not benchmarked
this configuration, so no guarantees that it (or the Intel SSDs
themselves) are as good as the various on-the-web tests indicate!

regards

Mark

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Cottenceau 2009-07-06 07:07:50 Re: Bundling postgreSQL with my Java application
Previous Message Mark Mielke 2009-07-06 06:00:24 Re: Bundling postgreSQL with my Java application