From: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Patvs <patvs(at)chello(dot)nl>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Six PostgreSQL questions from a pokerplayer |
Date: | 2009-07-06 06:13:12 |
Message-ID: | 4A5195F8.9030408@paradise.net.nz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Craig Ringer wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 11:51 -0700, Patvs wrote:
>
>
>
>> With 4 regular harddisks in RAID0 you get great read/write speeds, but the
>> SSDs excel in IO/s and a 0.1ms access time.
>>
>
> ... but are often really, really, really, really slow at writing. The
> fancier ones are fast at writing but generally slow down over time.
>
>
Also, (probably pointing out the obvious here) to be on the safe side
you should avoid RAID0 for any data that is important to you - as it's
pretty easy to get one bad disk straight from new!
With respect to SSD's one option for a small sized database is 2xSSD in
RAID1 - provided they are the *right* SSD that is, which at this point
in time seems to be the Intel X25E. Note that I have not benchmarked
this configuration, so no guarantees that it (or the Intel SSDs
themselves) are as good as the various on-the-web tests indicate!
regards
Mark
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Cottenceau | 2009-07-06 07:07:50 | Re: Bundling postgreSQL with my Java application |
Previous Message | Mark Mielke | 2009-07-06 06:00:24 | Re: Bundling postgreSQL with my Java application |