Re: pg_migrator mention in documentation

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>>> Consistency here is pointless. IIRC the dual method is used in contrib
>>> because people did not trust the PGXS stuff enough to rip the original
>>> Make code out; or maybe because people did not want PGXS to become the
>>> default build method, but they allowed it to be used in contrib as a
>>> test bed that PGXS worked.
>> The main reason contrib still has the alternate method is that PGXS
>> doesn't really work until after you've installed the core build.
>> For modules distributed separately from core, it doesn't seem that
>> exciting to be able to build using the contrib method.
>>
>> Now, having said that, I'm personally interested in being able to build
>> pg_migrator against an uninstalled source tree, because I foresee
>> needing to do that for RPM packaging purposes. But I could easily patch
>> the makefiles if needed to make that happen. I don't think this case
>> should drive the choice of what's the default or common method.
>
> Well, PGXS is now the recommended install method in the pg_migrator
> INSTALL file. What other changes should I make?

Since PGXS does not work under Windows, I think the only way to build
non-contrib extensions on Windows is the contrib way (i.e. place in
contrib folder and use contrib style Makefile).

Joe