From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 |
Date: | 2009-07-02 15:27:05 |
Message-ID: | 4A4CD1C9.2070809@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>
>> Kevin Grittner wrote:
>>
>>> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Since 2.5.33 is now over three years old, this does not seem like an
>>>> onerous requirement, but I thought I'd better ask if anyone has an
>>>> objection?
>>>>
>>> You'd be causing problems for SuSE Enterprise users, like us:
>>>
>
>
>> Keep in mind that if you build from a tarball, the lexer has already
>> been run elsewhere and you don't need flex.
>>
>
> Right, this will only affect people doing development or otherwise
> building from a CVS pull.
>
>
>
Of course, that includes the whole buildfarm. We might need to ask some
people to upgrade there.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-07-02 15:27:57 | Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-07-02 15:22:14 | Re: Upgrading our minimum required flex version for 8.5 |