From: | Mike Ivanov <mikei(at)activestate(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com> |
Cc: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sean Ma <seanxma(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: random slow query |
Date: | 2009-07-01 00:58:46 |
Message-ID: | 4A4AB4C6.8070808@activestate.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Scott Carey wrote:
> the OS can either quickly allocate to the process or
> the page cache from the free buffers, or more slowly take from the page
> cache, or even more slowly page out a process page.
>
Aha, now it all makes sense.
> I like to use the '5 second rule'. dirty_background_ratio should be sized
> so that it takes about 5 seconds to flush to disk in optimal conditions.
> dirty_ratio should be 2x to 5x this depending on your application's needs --
> for a system with well tuned postgres checkpoints, smaller tends to be
> better to limit stalls while waiting for the checkpoint fsync to finish.
>
Thanks a lot, this is invaluable information.
Regards,
Mike
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rui Carvalho | 2009-07-01 09:40:02 | - Slow Query |
Previous Message | Scott Carey | 2009-07-01 00:11:19 | Re: random slow query |