From: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] [v8.5] Security checks on largeobjects |
Date: | 2009-06-28 23:32:29 |
Message-ID: | 4A47FD8D.8090705@ak.jp.nec.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bernd Helmle wrote:
> --On 26. Juni 2009 13:08:37 +0900 KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> * Is the named large object (including fully qualified one) worth?
>> It will enables us to specify a largeobject with human readable
>> identifier string.
>
> I don't understand the notion of this. Does this mean you can create a
> LO with an identifier string, generated from (e.g.) your application?
Yes, it intends to assign an identifier string not only numeric
large object identifier. The identifier string can be qualified
with a certain namespace as follows.
E.g)
SELECT lo_open('my_picture01', x'40000'::int);
SELECT lo_create('pg_temp.my_musid02');
In the later case, the new largeobject will be reclaimed after
the session closed due to the temporary namespace.
Thanks,
--
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-06-29 02:41:57 | Re: dependencies for generated header files |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2009-06-28 22:35:38 | Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier |