Andrew Chernow wrote:
>
>> The only issue now is a small leak of memory in a function that is only
>> called a fixed (and very small) number of times per process. Given this,
>> I'm inclined to say we should put it on hold for 8.5. Thoughts?
>>
>>
>
> Doesn't sound urgent to me. If it were my decision, I'd punt it to 8.5.
Ok. Agreed then - added to the commitfest page.
> Hard to keep that win32 acl stuff leak free. There is always a cleanup
> goto because you need 6 billion objects to answer any question :o
Yeah, true.
--
Magnus Hagander
Self: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/