Re: 2 tables or two db?

From: Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com>
To:
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 2 tables or two db?
Date: 2009-06-18 15:32:04
Message-ID: 4A3A5DF4.1090409@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

ivan marchesini wrote:
> Dear postgres users,
>
> Suppose I have two tables of data.
>
> suppose the two table are really similar in dimensions
>
> suppose they will receive the same number and type of queries.
>
> in tems of performance (velocity of answer) it is better to place the
> two tables in the same db or into two different db?
>
> may be it is a stupid question, but....
>
> many many thanks...
>
> Ivan
>
>
>
>
>

My guess is that only physical separation will have any positive impact
otherwise the two datasets are competing for the same resources. At
least separate discs, controllers to avoid disc contention. Separate
postgres instances to allow separate caches (in affect separate memory).

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jyoti Seth 2009-06-19 10:40:34 SQL File in encrypted form
Previous Message ivan marchesini 2009-06-18 15:22:15 2 tables or two db?