Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 June 2009 23:54:41 Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>>
>>>>> I think it usually does that already ...
>>>>>
>>> Um, attached you will find a bunch of counterexamples.
>>>
>> At a quick look, I'm not sure that any of these are in code that hasn't
>> been edited since the 8.3 pgindent run.
>>
>
> So what does that mean then? Surely pgindent doesn't keep track of what has
> been edited when?
>
>
If the code has been edited since the last pgindent run, then pgindent
hasn't had a chance to adjust it, no?
cheers
andrew