Re: Resolving 8.4 open items

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Resolving 8.4 open items
Date: 2009-06-10 17:53:59
Message-ID: 4A2FF337.7060009@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> If we are to make the proposed schedule for 8.4 (ie, wrap RC1 tomorrow)
> we've got to get pretty hard-nosed about closing out the open items at
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_8.4_Open_Items
>
> The current list is:
>
> * do we need to worry about re-encoding file path names?
>
> There is perhaps a real issue here, but it's not been explained nearly
> to my satisfaction: I do not understand how we should determine which
> encoding should be passed to the filesystem (but surely that shouldn't
> vary with the per-database locale), and it's also unclear why we
> shouldn't assume the value of PGDATA is already in that encoding.
> Perhaps the issue really applies only to file paths supplied to COPY,
> in which case the proposed patch is fixing it in the wrong place.
> I think we should just punt this question to TODO.

Is there really something new here for 8.4? Haven't we lived with this
same thing previously?

If it's not a regression, +1 for punting.

--
Magnus Hagander
Self: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2009-06-10 18:01:28 Re: Multicolumn index corruption on 8.4 beta 2
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-06-10 17:45:05 Re: PlannerInfo Structure