| From: | Rob Sargent <robjsargent(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: setting the where clause |
| Date: | 2009-06-10 15:13:06 |
| Message-ID: | 4A2FCD82.7000206@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Tom Lane wrote:
> johnf <jfabiani(at)yolo(dot)com> writes:
>
>> I'm am programming in python using the Dabo modules. www.dabodev.com if your
>> interested. Dabo is a framework that provides an easy way to build desktop
>> app's. To clear a data entry form. I have been setting the where clause
>> to "where 1=0". This of course retrieves 0 records and my form will display
>> nothing. It has been suggested that it might be better to set the where
>> clause to a primary key value that does not exist in the table "where PK
>> = -9999999".
>>
>
> Whoever said that doesn't know what they're talking about. It's not
> faster (because it forces an actual index probe to happen) and it's not
> safer (what if one day that PK value exists?).
>
> I'd personally go with "where false"; why not say what you mean rather
> than forcing humans and computers to deduce that the condition is
> constant false?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
Of course you would do the world a favour if you wrote a client-side
clear-the-screen routine that didn't pester the net and the server
un-necessarily.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bryce Nesbitt | 2009-06-11 06:20:41 | Re: Avoiding "will create implicit index" NOTICE |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-06-10 14:19:14 | Re: setting the where clause |