Re: Scalability in postgres

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Dimitri" <dimitrik(dot)fr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Flavio Henrique Araque Gurgel" <flavio(at)4linux(dot)com(dot)br>, "Fabrix" <fabrixio1(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "James Mansion" <james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Scalability in postgres
Date: 2009-06-03 17:45:31
Message-ID: 4A26706B0200002500027422@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Dimitri <dimitrik(dot)fr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Few weeks ago tested a customer application on 16 cores with Oracle:
> - 20,000 sessions in total
> - 70,000 queries/sec
>
> without any problem on a mid-range Sun box + Solaris 10..

I'm not sure what point you are trying to make. Could you elaborate?

(If it's that Oracle doesn't need an external connection pool, then
are you advocating that PostgreSQL include that in the base product?)

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Carey 2009-06-03 18:12:01 Re: Scalability in postgres
Previous Message Dimitri 2009-06-03 17:26:56 Re: Scalability in postgres