| From: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, Flavio Henrique Araque Gurgel <flavio(at)4linux(dot)com(dot)br>, Fabrix <fabrixio1(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Scalability in postgres |
| Date: | 2009-06-02 00:42:19 |
| Message-ID: | 4A24756B.3060305@cheapcomplexdevices.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:
>
> I thought that's where the difference is between postgresql and oracle
> mostly, ability to handle more transactions and better scalability .
>
Which were you suggesting had this "better scalability"?
I recall someone summarizing to a CFO where I used to work:
"Oracle may scale technologically, but it doesn't scale well financially."
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2009-06-02 04:23:04 | Re: Scalability in postgres |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-06-02 00:41:04 | Re: Vacuuming technique doubt |