| From: | Anne Rosset <arosset(at)collab(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Unexpected query plan results |
| Date: | 2009-05-29 21:57:30 |
| Message-ID: | 4A205A4A.5050406@collab.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Robert Haas wrote:
>On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Anne Rosset <arosset(at)collab(dot)net> wrote:
>
>
>> -> Index Scan using
>>item_pk on item (cost=0.00..176865.31 rows=97498 width=88) (actual
>>time=117.304..2405.060 rows=71 loops=1)
>> Filter: ((NOT
>>is_deleted) AND ((folder_id)::text = 'tracker3641'::text))
>>
>>
>
>The fact that the estimated row count differs from the actual row
>count by a factor of more than 1000 is likely the root cause of your
>problem here. You probably want to figure out why that's happening.
>How many rows are in that table and what value are you using for
>default_statistics_target?
>
>...Robert
>
>
The table has 468173 rows and the value for default_statistics_target is
750.
Anne
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-05-29 22:15:37 | Re: Unexpected query plan results |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2009-05-29 21:34:02 | Re: Unexpected query plan results |