| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby |
| Date: | 2009-05-27 17:14:17 |
| Message-ID: | 4A1D74E9.2070505@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> My experience is that consensus/votes will be overruled by final
> committer, if they disagree,
>
That's a fairly strong statement. I can't think of an occasion when this
has happened on any matter of significance, and I can remember many
times when Tom, Bruce and others have bowed to the consensus despite
their own preferences.
Bruce said the other day that we are trustees of the code, and I don't
think I could put it better. I know I am conscious of that.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2009-05-27 17:45:55 | Re: search_path vs extensions |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-05-27 16:54:36 | Re: New trigger option of pg_standby |