Re: Postgres, DB design, and object IDs (of any ilk)

From: Kenneth Tilton <kentilton(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres, DB design, and object IDs (of any ilk)
Date: 2009-05-21 18:01:13
Message-ID: 4A1596E9.5070208@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Kenneth Tilton <kentilton(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> If the primary key of the customer table is cust_short_name and my DB
>> reflects also customer departments, I can link a customer to its departments
>> one of three ways:
>>
>> 1. The department table has a cust_short_name column and makes that the
>> first segment of its primary_key;
>>
>> 3. I give the customer a cust_serial_id column and make it SERIAL and give
>> the dept table a column called cust_serial_id.
>
> This is the very well tread 'natural vs. surrogate key' debate.

Ah, thx for the label, I have been able to google up some pros and cons.

Thx again,

kt

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Raymond O'Donnell 2009-05-21 18:04:58 Re: running postgresql on a private machine accessing it from public web pages
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-05-21 17:52:48 Re: running postgresql on a private machine accessing it from public web pages