From: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: INTERVAL data type and libpq - what format? |
Date: | 2009-05-20 09:41:10 |
Message-ID: | 4A13D036.9070406@cheapcomplexdevices.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Sam Mason wrote:
> You get an error because " 123 11" isn't a valid literal of an
> (undecorated) INTERVAL type.
Hmm..... should it be?
Skimming the spec makes me think it might be a valid day-time interval.
Quoting the spec:
<unquoted interval string> ::=
[ <sign> ] { <year-month literal> | <day-time literal> }
...
<day-time literal> ::=
<day-time interval>
| <time interval>
<day-time interval> ::=
<days value> [ <space> <hours value> [ <colon> <minutes value>
[ <colon> <seconds value> ] ] ]
I can send a patch if this interpretation is right...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Raymond O'Donnell | 2009-05-20 09:41:49 | Re: Can I pause the pg_dump or pg_restore |
Previous Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2009-05-20 09:36:43 | Re: [Windows] Feedback on PG? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stefan Keller | 2009-05-20 10:34:00 | Re: Proposal: functions get_text() or get_url() |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-05-20 08:48:34 | Re: Compiler warning |