From: | Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | "James B(dot) Byrne" <byrnejb(at)harte-lyne(dot)ca> |
Subject: | Re: Help with join syntax sought |
Date: | 2009-05-19 21:34:24 |
Message-ID: | 4A1325E0.5040908@squeakycode.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
James B. Byrne wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 16:41, Andy Colson wrote:
>
>> If your query above is getting you mostly what you want, just use it
>> as a derived table.
>>
>
> I lack the experience to understand what this means.
>
> If, as you suggest, I use a subquery as the expression to the main
> SELECT and for it I use the syntax that returns every distinct
> combination of base, quote, timestamp, and type, then what?
>
> Unless I am missing something then I still have too many rows for
> those currencies with more than one type.
>
I was not offering a specific answer, just another tool you could use to
massage the data more. What I'm saying is, with that first query you
got the data into a new format.... Think of that result set as a table
itself.
As if you had done:
create table tmp (lots of field);
insert into tmp select (that big query you first posted)
now can you select from tmp to get your answer? Once again, I may be
leading you down the wrong path, and as I said before I don't know your
data/layouts, and I didn't study your sql very much.
-Andy
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John R Pierce | 2009-05-19 21:39:15 | Re: origins/destinations |
Previous Message | Andy Colson | 2009-05-19 21:29:45 | Re: Help with join syntax sought |