From: | "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Optimizing Read-Only Scalability |
Date: | 2009-05-17 03:36:04 |
Message-ID: | 4A0F8624.8090802@sun.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 16:21 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>
>>> So we can optimize away the scan through the procarray by doing two "if"
>>> tests, one outside of the lock, one inside. In normal running, both will
>>> be optimized away, though in read-only periods we would avoid much work.
>>>
>> How much work would it be to work up a test patch?
>>
>
> Not much. The most important thing is a place to test it and access to
> detailed feedback. Let's see if Dimitri does this.
>
> There are some other tuning aspects to be got right first also, but
> those are already known.
>
>
I would be interested in testing it out.. I have been collecting some
sysbench read-scalability numbers and some other numbers that I can cook
up with dbt3 , igen.. So I have a frame of reference on those numbers ..
I am sure we can always use some extra performance.
Regards,
Jignesh
--
Jignesh Shah http://blogs.sun.com/jkshah
The New Sun Microsystems,Inc http://sun.com/postgresql
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-05-17 03:40:42 | Re: generate_series from now to infinity... |
Previous Message | Dickson S. Guedes | 2009-05-17 02:10:20 | generate_series from now to infinity... |