From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Seth Robertson <in-pgsql-hackers(at)baka(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Automatic client certificate selection support for libpq v1 |
Date: | 2009-05-11 17:00:58 |
Message-ID: | 4A0859CA.8080802@hagander.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Monday 11 May 2009 11:02:17 Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> Another thought: if we were to make ourselves support multiple SSL
>> libraries (that has been suggested before - at that point, people wanted
>> GnuTLS), we could also add support for Windows SChannel, which I'm sure
>> some win32 people would certainly prefer - much easier to do SSL
>> deployments within an existing MS infrastructure...
>>
>> But no, that certainly wouldn't *reduce* the amount of code...
>
> We'll call that Plan C: Making PostgreSQL the first piece of software in the
> world to support four different crypto libraries. ;-)
I could've sworn curl did :-) But it turns out they do SChannel
*through* OpenSSL. :-) So we can probably live with that ;)
//Magnus
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Boszormenyi Zoltan | 2009-05-11 17:34:50 | Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5 |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-05-11 16:59:16 | Re: [PATCH] Automatic client certificate selection support for libpq v1 |