Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking
Date: 2009-05-07 12:26:31
Message-ID: 4A02D377.6080009@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs wrote:
> It wouldn't be 692 lines of code and even if it were the impact of that
> code would be such that it would need to be optional, since it would
> differ in definition from an existing SQL Standard isolation mode and it
> would have additional performance implications.

I thought it would be equal to the SQL standard Serializable mode,
whereas what we currently call serializable is in fact not as strong as
the SQL standard Serializable mode.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Albe Laurenz 2009-05-07 12:47:22 Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking
Previous Message Dickson S. Guedes 2009-05-07 12:09:39 Re: WIP patch for TODO Item: Add prompt escape to display the client and server versions