From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ECPG, two varchars with same name on same line |
Date: | 2009-05-07 11:33:16 |
Message-ID: | 4A02C6FC.9020305@enterprisedb.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 03:49:47PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> ECPG constructs internal struct names for VARCHAR fields using the field
>> name and line number it's defined on. In a contrived example, though,
>> that's not unique. Consider the following example:
>> ...
>> That hardly happens in practice, of course, but it's trivial to fix by
>> just adding some more salt to the struct name, like a simple counter, so
>> it seems we should.
>
> In principle you're right. However, the change needs to be added in several
> places like the internal variable structure that keeps the lineno anyway but
> needs to add the counter too. BTW we can remove the lineno then I think.
> Anyway, given that we are close to a release and the bug apparently never got
> up in a real life usage for years I'd prefer to not change it now but wait
> until the release has been done.
Yeah, if the fix isn't trivial, it's not worth it.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-05-07 11:34:53 | Re: BUG #4796: Recovery followed by backup creates unrecoverable WAL-file |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2009-05-07 10:57:56 | Re: conditional dropping of columns/constraints |