Re: windows doesn't notice backend death

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: windows doesn't notice backend death
Date: 2009-05-05 16:05:34
Message-ID: 4A0063CE.2000603@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>
>> Attached is a proposed patch for the "dead man switch" idea.
>> ...
>> Barring objections I'll go ahead and apply this to HEAD. I'm wondering
>> whether we are sufficiently worried about the Windows task manager issue
>> to risk back-patching into 8.3 and 8.2 ... comments?
>>
>
> For lack of response, I assume no one wants to back-patch this.
>
>
>

No, I think it's unnecessary, now we understand what's going on.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2009-05-05 16:08:24 Re: ALTER TABLE ... ALTER COLUMN ... SET DISTINCT
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-05-05 15:57:12 Re: windows doesn't notice backend death