Re: windows doesn't notice backend death

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: windows doesn't notice backend death
Date: 2009-05-02 20:56:01
Message-ID: 49FCB361.9070305@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>> ... I killed a backend using the task manager, and
>> the postmaster never noticed.
>>
>
> Ick. Is it possible that the postmaster did get a report, but thought
> it was normal session termination? If so, how could we distinguish?
>
>
>

If that were the case then it would not have the dead process still
listed as a live backend, ISTM, which it does.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-05-02 22:05:24 Re: windows doesn't notice backend death
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-05-02 20:38:48 Re: windows doesn't notice backend death