| From: | Tobias Zahn <tobias-zahn(at)arcor(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: GEQO: ERX |
| Date: | 2009-05-02 15:45:22 |
| Message-ID: | 49FC6A92.7000302@arcor.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello again,
I didn't not get any response to my initial message below. Now I am
wondering if nobody is into the optimizer or if my question was just too
stupid. Could you please give me some clues? Your help would really be
appreciated.
Regards,
Tobias
> Hello,
> I was digging through the optimizer code and have a question regarding
> the edge recombination crossover (ERX) of the GEQO. It might be
> completely stupid and therefore I apologize for this in advance.
>
> As far as I understand it, the idea of the ERX is the minimization of
> edge failures. When reading in geqo_main.c and geqo_erx.c, it seams that
> every iterative round (generation) it is checked by gimme_tour() if
> there where any edge failures. When I understand the algorithm right,
> there should be no edge failures.
> Therefore I think about NOT checking for edge failures anymore, to save
> some time. (If it just to make sure, it could be done only once in the
> end.) Might that work or do I have some errors in my thoughts?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Tobias
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2009-05-02 15:51:48 | Re: Updated Korean character set mappings |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-05-02 15:37:16 | Re: GEQO: ERX |