| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: idea: global temp tables |
| Date: | 2009-04-29 14:21:54 |
| Message-ID: | 49F81C32.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On the matter of LOCAL/GLOBAL, I think the correct thing to do is to
> reject LOCAL and accept GLOBAL as equivalent to the default.
Oops. Read that too quickly before my first reply. I think that we
should, as Tom said, warn on *both* for 8.4, and treat GLOBAL per the
standard in 8.5. I don't know whether we can do anything useful with
LOCAL for 8.5, or whether it should be rejected at that point.
Sorry for my confusion about what you were saying.
-Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andy Lester | 2009-04-29 15:03:24 | Throw some low-level C scutwork at me |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-04-29 14:13:25 | Re: idea: global temp tables |