| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Why do we let CREATE DATABASE reassign encoding? |
| Date: | 2009-04-23 18:54:20 |
| Message-ID: | 49F0B95C.20005@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>> We should presumably let the encoding be changed when cloning
>> from template0, and probably it's reasonable to trust the user
>> if either source or destination DB encoding is SQL_ASCII.
>> In other cases I'm thinking it should fail.
>
> On a pedantic level, doesn't this remove the ability to have
> databases on a single cluster that are different encodings? I mean,
> if template1 is utf8, and I can't change that using CREATE
> DATABASE, then I'm stuck with utf8 for all databases on that
> cluster ... unless I'm missing something.
You could still use template0 as template for a database with any
encoding, like:
CREATE DATABASE .. TEMPLATE = template0;
We can special case template0 because we know its contents are pure
7-bit ascii which is compatible with any server encoding.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2009-04-23 18:59:52 | Re: Why do we let CREATE DATABASE reassign encoding? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-04-23 18:52:57 | Re: Why do we let CREATE DATABASE reassign encoding? |