<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-15"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
that's a good point.. not sure opensource database like PostgreSQL
would suffice to say Oracle doesn't have a monopoly. Of course, if
enough conversation were to be made illustrating how, in fact,
PostgreSQL is such a strong platform as to make MySql & Oracle's
marriage not mean a monopoly, that would be good for this community too.<br>
<br>
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:200904201741(dot)03085(dot)peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Monday 20 April 2009 16:24:32 Gabriele Bartolini wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> I am still in the process of understanding the impact of this on a
wider scale. I would love to collect some ideas that can be presented
during community talks, as "How is Oracle acquisition of Sun going to
influence PostgreSQL" is a question that often and inevitably will be
asked - I presume. I would love to get a list of PROS/CONS of this
agreement as far as PostgreSQL is concerned, both from a technical point
of view and a marketing point of view, so I believe your ideas are more
than welcome!
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Note that these announcement all conspicuously omit any mention of MySQL. One
might expect that that part of the deal will be under regulatory
investigation.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>