Re: JDBC 8.0-310 + Crystal Reports 10 == Not Implemented

From: "Dave Held" <dave(dot)held(at)arraysg(dot)com>
To: "Kris Jurka" <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: JDBC 8.0-310 + Crystal Reports 10 == Not Implemented
Date: 2005-08-31 19:19:35
Message-ID: 49E94D0CFCD4DB43AFBA928DDD20C8F902618590@asg002.asg.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kris Jurka [mailto:books(at)ejurka(dot)com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 2:08 PM
> To: Dave Held
> Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [JDBC] JDBC 8.0-310 + Crystal Reports 10 == Not
> Implemented
>
>
> Someone else reported this before and we added additional
> error text to the not implemented message to help track
> down what it needed to work.
> Unfortunately they never tried it and got back to us.
> Does the development driver provide any more detail?

Unfortunately not. It gives exactly the same message as the
production driver. I wonder if this problem has to do with
incomplete support for DatabaseMetaData methods? After all,
the tool I am using shows table schema information rather
than raw data (it's a modeling/designer tool).

__
David B. Held
Software Engineer/Array Services Group
200 14th Ave. East, Sartell, MN 56377
320.534.3637 320.253.7800 800.752.8129

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Jurka 2005-08-31 20:15:54 Re: JDBC 8.0-310 + Crystal Reports 10 == Not Implemented
Previous Message Kris Jurka 2005-08-31 19:07:57 Re: JDBC 8.0-310 + Crystal Reports 10 == Not Implemented