From: | "Dave Held" <dave(dot)held(at)arraysg(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
Date: | 2005-05-03 21:10:01 |
Message-ID: | 49E94D0CFCD4DB43AFBA928DDD20C8F9026184FC@asg002.asg.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: adnandursun(at)asrinbilisim(dot)com(dot)tr
> [mailto:adnandursun(at)asrinbilisim(dot)com(dot)tr]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 3:36 PM
> To: Dave Held; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Feature freeze date for 8.1
>
> [...]
> Yes, this looks like good.But ;
>
> 1. Do client interfaces (ODBC,JDBC OLEDB etc) need to
> be changed ?
Only if they want to support the keepalive mechanism. It should
be purely optional.
> 2. If a firewall is used, ppl need to know the second
> port number so mean that 2 parameters should be added to
> postgres the first is timeout value and the second is port
> number of the second port would be used for keepalive..
Sounds fine to me.
__
David B. Held
Software Engineer/Array Services Group
200 14th Ave. East, Sartell, MN 56377
320.534.3637 320.253.7800 800.752.8129
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-05-03 21:20:06 | Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1 |
Previous Message | =?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= | 2005-05-03 20:57:19 | Re: Regression tests |