Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1

From: "Dave Held" <dave(dot)held(at)arraysg(dot)com>
To: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Date: 2005-05-03 21:10:01
Message-ID: 49E94D0CFCD4DB43AFBA928DDD20C8F9026184FC@asg002.asg.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: adnandursun(at)asrinbilisim(dot)com(dot)tr
> [mailto:adnandursun(at)asrinbilisim(dot)com(dot)tr]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 3:36 PM
> To: Dave Held; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Feature freeze date for 8.1
>
> [...]
> Yes, this looks like good.But ;
>
> 1. Do client interfaces (ODBC,JDBC OLEDB etc) need to
> be changed ?

Only if they want to support the keepalive mechanism. It should
be purely optional.

> 2. If a firewall is used, ppl need to know the second
> port number so mean that 2 parameters should be added to
> postgres the first is timeout value and the second is port
> number of the second port would be used for keepalive..

Sounds fine to me.

__
David B. Held
Software Engineer/Array Services Group
200 14th Ave. East, Sartell, MN 56377
320.534.3637 320.253.7800 800.752.8129

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-05-03 21:20:06 Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Previous Message =?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= 2005-05-03 20:57:19 Re: Regression tests