Re: backup getting larger and larger

From: Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>
To: Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail(at)webthatworks(dot)it>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: backup getting larger and larger
Date: 2009-04-14 20:26:24
Message-ID: 49E4F170.9040403@pinpointresearch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ivan Sergio Borgonovo wrote:
> I still have to investigate if the tables are getting really
> larger... but at a first guess there shouldn't be any good reason to
> see tables getting so large so fast... so I was wondering if
> anything could contribute to make a backup much larger than it was
> other than table containing more records?
>
> The only thing that should have been really changed is the number of
> concurrent connections during a backup.
>
Can we assume that by backup you mean pg_dump/pg_dumpall? If so, then
the change is likely due to increasing data in the database. I have a
daily report that emails me a crude but useful estimate of table
utilization based on this query:

select
relname as table,
to_char(8*relpages, '999,999,999') as "size (kB)",
(100.0*relpages/(select sum(relpages) from pg_class where
relkind='r'))::numeric(4,1) as percent
from
pg_class
where
relkind = 'r'
order by
relpages desc
limit 20;

If, however, you are doing a filesystem backup then table and index
bloat could, indeed, increase your backup size. But more importantly,
you will likely be in for a rude surprise should you ever need to restore.

Cheers,
Steve

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Broersma 2009-04-14 21:36:02 Re: Using CHECK while CREATE'ing table
Previous Message Kynn Jones 2009-04-14 20:19:42 Re: 'no pg_hba.conf entry for host "[local]", user "postgres", database "postgres"'...