Re: Are there performance advantages in storing bulky field in separate table?

From: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
To: Sam Mason <sam(at)samason(dot)me(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Are there performance advantages in storing bulky field in separate table?
Date: 2009-04-08 20:05:55
Message-ID: 49DD03A3.9070700@cheapcomplexdevices.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Sam Mason wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 04:56:35PM +0100, Ian Mayo wrote:
>> One more thing: hey, did you hear? I just got some advice from Tom Lane!
>
> Statistically speaking; he's the person most likely to answer you by

Even so, this might be the #1 advantage of Postgres over Oracle (cost
being #2).

Unless you're one of their ten biggest customers, I imagine it'd take
quite some time to similar support from the core team's counterparts
of the other big databases.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-04-08 20:06:33 Re: No return from trigger function
Previous Message hubert depesz lubaczewski 2009-04-08 20:05:29 Re: No return from trigger function