Re: Forcing seq_scan off for large table joined with tiny table yeilds improved performance

Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 6:20 AM, Mario Splivalo
> <mario(dot)splivalo(at)megafon(dot)hr> wrote:
>> Scott Marlowe wrote:
>>> It's not really solved, it's just a happy coincidence that the current
>>> plan runs well. In order to keep the query planner making good
>>> choices you need to increase stats target for the field in the index
>>> above. The easiest way to do so is to do this:
>>>
>>> alter database mydb set default_statistics_target=100;
>>>
>>> and run analyze again:
>>>
>>> analyze;
>> So, i removed the index on field_name, set default_default_statistics_target
>> to 100, analyzed, and the results are the same:
>
> Why did you remove the index?
>

Because I already have index on that column, index needed to enforce PK
constraint. Here is the original DDL for the table:

CREATE TABLE photo_info_data
(
photo_id integer NOT NULL,
field_name character varying NOT NULL,
field_value character varying,
CONSTRAINT photo_info_data_pk PRIMARY KEY (user_id, field_name)
)

CREATE INDEX photo_info_data_ix_field_value
ON user_info_data USING btree (field_value);

So, there is index on (user_id, field_name). Postgres is using index for
user_id (...WHERE user_id = 12345) but not on field-name (...WHERE
field_name = 'f-spot'). When I add extra index on field name:

CREATE INDEX photo_info_data_ix__field_name
ON user_info_data USING btree (field_name);

Then that index is used.

Mike