| From: | Rikard Pavelic <rikard(dot)pavelic(at)zg(dot)htnet(dot)hr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: self join revisited |
| Date: | 2009-04-01 18:41:49 |
| Message-ID: | 49D3B56D.9050802@zg.htnet.hr |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Rikard Pavelic <rikard(dot)pavelic(at)zg(dot)htnet(dot)hr> writes:
>
>> It would be great if Postgres could rewrite this query
>>
>
> AFAICS those queries are not going to produce the same results,
> so Postgres would be 100% incorrect to rewrite it like that for you.
>
> (If they do produce the same results, it would depend on a bunch
> of assumptions you have not stated.)
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Can I try again? :)
How hard would it be to teach the planner about preserving uniqueness of
relations in subqueries?
And using that information to remove unnecessary self joins on unique sets?
I can try to rewrite some queries to test it on real data for how much
gain it would provide.
Regards,
Rikard
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stef Telford | 2009-04-01 19:51:35 | Re: Raid 10 chunksize |
| Previous Message | Matthew Wakeling | 2009-04-01 18:27:19 | Re: Very specialised query |