From: | Stef Telford <stef(at)ummon(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org> |
Cc: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Raid 10 chunksize |
Date: | 2009-04-01 17:10:48 |
Message-ID: | 49D3A018.7090700@ummon.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Matthew Wakeling wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Stef Telford wrote:
>> Good UPS, a warm PITR standby, offsite backups and regular checks is
>> "good enough" for me, and really, that's what it all comes down to.
>> Mitigating risk and factors into an 'acceptable' amount for each person.
>> However, if you see over a 2x improvement from turning write-cache 'on'
>> and have everything else in place, well, that seems like a 'no-brainer'
>> to me, at least ;)
>
> In that case, buying a battery-backed-up cache in the RAID controller
> would be even more of a no-brainer.
>
> Matthew
>
Hey Matthew,
See about 3 messages ago.. We already have them (I did say UPS or
BBU, it should have been a logical 'and' instead of logical 'or' .. my
bad ;). Your right though, that was a no-brainer as well.
I am wondering how the card (3ware 9550sx) will work with SSD's, md
or lvm, blocksize, ext3 or ext4 .. but.. this is the point of
benchmarking ;)
Regards
Stef
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-04-01 17:19:10 | Re: self join revisited |
Previous Message | Matthew Wakeling | 2009-04-01 17:10:16 | Re: Very specialised query |