From: | Tatsuhito Kasahara <kasahara(dot)tatsuhito(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: display previous query string of idle-in-transaction |
Date: | 2009-03-27 06:44:51 |
Message-ID: | 49CC75E3.7010101@oss.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
>> If we can also check previous query_string of idle-in-transaction,
>> it is useful for analysis of long transaction problem.
>
> I'm more interested in the problem itself. Why do you think there is a
> problem and why does knowing this help you? I had similar problems
> recently, so I'm interested in thoughts around this.
In many case, applications don't know what queries they are doing.
So, if a long transaction problem (unworking defragmnetation by HOT and
VACUUM) occured, I don't understand which application is the cause with
only "<IDLE> in transaction" message.
But if I can also check last query string, I guess which apllication
do that and point out the problem point.
# As I said, I think a long transaction is not a problem itself.
Does that answer your question ?
Best regards,
--
Tatsuhito Kasahara
kasahara(dot)tatsuhito(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Smet | 2009-03-27 07:07:43 | Re: 8.4 open items list |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-03-27 04:56:01 | Re: typedefs for indent |