Re: New trigger option of pg_standby

Hi,

Guillaume Smet wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> What does "the default" mean? You mean that new trigger should use
>> the existing trigger option character (-t)?
>
> Yes, that's my point.
>
> I understand it seems weird to switch the options but I'm pretty sure
> a lot of persons currently using -t would be surprised by the current
> behaviour. Moreover playing all the remaining WALs before starting up
> should be the most natural option when people are looking in the help.
>
> That said, it would be nice to hear from people really using
> pg_standby to know if they understand how it works now and if it's
> what they intended when they set it up.

My fault not RTFM well enough, but I was surprised finding out that -t
is working like that.

+1 for me to switch -t to the new behaviour.

Cheers

--
Matteo Beccati

OpenX - http://www.openx.org