From: | Mark Cave-Ayland <mark(dot)cave-ayland(at)siriusit(dot)co(dot)uk> |
---|---|
To: | peterw(at)borstad(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Proper entry of polygon type data |
Date: | 2009-03-25 16:49:56 |
Message-ID: | 49CA60B4.5020701@siriusit.co.uk |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Peter Willis wrote:
> I am aware of PostGIS and already use it. My question was regarding
> the entry format of PostgreSQL polygon data. There is a void
> in the PostgreSQL documentation regarding this.
>
> Incidentally, PostGIS uses PostgreSQL polygon, point, and path
> data types.
Errr... no it doesn't. PostGIS uses its own internal types to represent
all the different geometries, although it does provide a cast between
the existing PostgreSQL types as an aid for people wishing to migrate.
> Using PostGIS for simple , non-geographic, polygon rules is a
> bit like using a tank to kill a mosquito.
Interesting metaphor... ;)
ATB,
Mark.
--
Mark Cave-Ayland - Senior Technical Architect
PostgreSQL - PostGIS
Sirius Corporation plc - control through freedom
http://www.siriusit.co.uk
t: +44 870 608 0063
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2009-03-25 16:50:01 | Re: MAX(ROW(...)) - feature request |
Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2009-03-25 16:42:38 | Deferrable constraints |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-03-25 16:55:10 | Re: Review: B-Tree emulation for GIN |
Previous Message | hubert depesz lubaczewski | 2009-03-25 16:48:59 | Re: display previous query string of idle-in-transaction |